Many things, but most important is that it got bigger and better. This EDB360 free tool provided by Enkitec is maturing over time. Its core function has not changed although, which is to present a 360-degree view of a database (10g or higher).
EDB360 is a nice complement to other tools like Exacheck, Raccheck or Oracheck. It has some additional benefits, like taking a snapshot of a system to then be analyzed offline or simply (more...)
Both eAdam and eDB360 tools are available at the Enkitec web site under the Products tab. You can download a free copy from there; or maybe you were given by an Enkitec consultant a newer version for you to execute. In any case, the question is: “how do I execute these tools?“
- Take the eadam.zip file and unzip it on your server
- Navigate to the top eadam directory which contains (more...)
As of today, you can download this free tool out of our Enkitec‘s web page. Just select “eAdam” under the Products Tab.
The next version of eAdam will incorporate the GV$views, equivalent to the currently extracted DBA_HIST set. The reason of this enhancement is to handle read-only databases (DataGuard – DG). So views like GV$ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY will be available for data mining within the eAdam staging repository.
Any ways, I hope you enjoy this new (more...)
You recently learned about eDB360, and now eAdam? What is this eAdam tool? Before you continue reading, please be aware that eAdam reads data from AWR, thus you must have a license for the Oracle Diagnostics Pack in order to use this new eAdam tool.
New eAdam is a free tool to perform data mining on performance related historical data recorded by AWR. The main characteristics of eAdam are:
Besides been what I consider a horrendous color, “edb360” also stands for Enkitec’s “database 360-degree” view. Simply put: edb360 is a new free tool that provides a 360-degree view of an Oracle database.
What is “edb360“?
This “edb360” tool is the product of a collaborative effort of some very smart guys, and me. Special thanks to Frits Hoogland, Karl Arao, Randy Johnson, Martin Bach, Kyle Hailey, Tanel Poder, (more...)
This blog posting is about answering this first question below, which I often get asked:
Can I use SQLTXPLAIN (SQLT) instead of AWR?
The answer is: it depends. If you are doing SQL Tuning and you already know the SQL_ID, then you may want to use SQLT XTRACT (MOS 215187.1) directly on the SQL_ID of concern. But even in that case, keep in mind that SQLT accesses AWR data, so your environment must have (more...)
Every so often I see systems where there is a good amount of SQL that uses Literals instead of Binds, and executes enough times to create a large number of Cursors. Is this a red flag? As many questions regarding performance, I would say the right answer is: it all depends.
Of course we want to use Binds instead of Literals in order to reduce the frequency of Hard Parses, and in turn reduce CPU (more...)
I will be delivering a couple of courses soon. One in January and the second in February. I will keep posting upcoming Training and Conferences on a new link at the right margin of this blog.
Exadata Optimizations Jan 13-14
This 2-days “Exadata Optimizations” course is for Developers (more...)
Legacy PL/SQL code with intermittent performance degradation.
To improve the performance of this code, the first step is to diagnose it. But this code has no instrumentation whatsoever, it is in Production, and rolling any code into Production usually requires rigorous testing. So, whatever method we implement has to (more...)
A friend of mine asked me last night basically this: “How is that SQLTXPLAIN counts rows?”. In particular, he was referring to the use of the SAMPLE clause of the SELECT statement. Look at this SQLT’s log piece:
SELECT /*+ FULL(t) PARALLEL */ COUNT(*) * 1e4