Well, the annual spectacle of enormous proportions has come to a conclusion again. And thats probably the first reason I’d recommend OpenWorld to anyone who works with Oracle who has never been to it. It’s a jaw dropping moment just to see the scale of the event, and how impressively its organised in terms of facilities, lunches, registration and the like.
But onto the technical elements, here’s my impressions of this years conference:
1) Big (more...)
Its day minus 3, or day +1 depending on your point of view at Openworld 2014.
I’m here a few days early for the Ace Director briefings, where a selection of product managers provide an insight into what is coming in the Oracle world, either at Openworld or in the coming year.
I must admit, I arrived to the briefings somewhat sceptical because a couple of years ago, when I was last at the briefings, (more...)
I’ll be in Openworld again this year, and have a couple of speaking slots…
I’ll talk about new features for developers in 12c on Sunday, Sep 28, 2:30 Moscone South 303
and of course, at the awesome Oaktable world..
Drop in, learn some cool things, or just pop up and say Hello!
Anyone who has used Oracle for a while will be familiar with the Parent/Child locking "issue" when it comes to tables and indexes on foreign keys. For many years you’d hear people crying "bug" etc but thankfully most now know the reason, and accept it as sensible behaviour.
But lets take a look at a slight variation on that theme.
Lets start with a table called "LOC" which will be our parent table in (more...)
This was going to the be the immediate follow up to my previous post, but 126.96.36.199 came out and I got all excited about that and forgot to post this one :-)
Anyway, the previous post showed how easy it is to convert between nested tables and associative arrays. The nice thing in 12c is that this is no longer needed – you can query the associative arrays directly
One of my favourite security "tricks" used to be the following:
SQL> [create|alter] user MY_USER identified by values 'impossible';
Looks odd, but by setting the encrypted value of someone’s password to something that it is impossible to encrypt to, means you’ll never be able to connect as that account. (Think schema’s owning objects etc).
I hear you ask: "Why not just lock the account?"
Well…in my opinion, that’s a security hole. Let’s (more...)
A common criticism of PLSQL is that the "original" array datatype, now called associative arrays are perfect for passing stuff back and forth to 3GL environments (for example .Net), but canno be used within SQL natively, for example:
SQL> create or replace
2 package BLAH is
3 type num_list is table of number index by pls_integer;
4 type str_list is table of varchar2(30) index by pls_integer;
6 procedure ODP_PROC(n out num_list, s out str_list);
Sadly there seems to be no concept of the Hakan factor for an IOT.
I have an application which merges into an IOT, the merge incrementally populating a swag of initially null columns, hence growing the rows in size. Some simple benchmarking shows the overhead of this versus merging into a table with pre-populated values:
SQL> create table T1
2 ( x int primary key,
3 y1 number(10),
4 y2 number(10),
5 y3 number(10),
We have a fairly common query process, where we run a MERGE command to compare a remote table to a local copy of it, as "poor mans" Golden Gate to bring that table up to date on a regular basis. [Editors note: Writing MERGE's is more complicated but a lot cheaper than Golden Gate :-)]
After an upgrade to 12c, the performance of some of the MERGE’s went very bad…and you can see what (more...)